The film falls into familiar science fiction tropes and becomes more predictable as it goes on. Similarly, the film’s central driving relationship, between Lena and Kane, does not get significantly developed, which leaves a bit of hollowness in the center of our protagonist’s motivations.Įven the stellar mystery Garland established at the film’s onset, starts to unravel in the film’s third act. Yet, these more personal plots are thrown into the background by the movie’s more gripping central mysteries. The theme of self-destruction is brought up, with members of the expeditionary team grappling with things like attempted suicide, addiction and cancer. The visuals give the movie an interesting balance of awe and tension, which it pulls from as the plot grows bleaker and the scenes become more grisly and violent.ĭespite the excellent cinematography, the movie seems to lack direction in terms of the message it intends to express. They help to build The Shimmer into a place that is both psychedelic and ominous, one where you’re both entranced by the beauty of it all and simultaneously afraid of what will develop next. The visuals in this movie are extremely impressive. She wants to find out what happened to her husband, played by Oscar Isaac, who went missing for a year after being sent into The Shimmer on a military mission before mysteriously reappearing. Army veteran Lena, portrayed by Natalie Portman, undergoes the mission with an ulterior motive. While the expedition is supposedly a scientific one, biology professor and U.S. Within The Shimmer, plants and animals are in a state of near-constant mutation, and it is expanding, threatening to engulf nearby towns and cities. Based on the novel of the same name by Jeff VanderMeer, the film chronicles the expedition of five scientists, all women, into a mysterious area known as “Area X” or “The Shimmer,” which has appeared on the Florida coastline following a meteor strike. “Annihilation” is the latest creation from the mind of Alex Garland, the author-turned-director known for writing and directing 2016’s “Ex Machina.” Garland’s follow-up to his directorial debut has many of the same strengths and weaknesses as its predecessor. These are things you can hardly call pleasant experiences, yet I still admit that “Annihilation” was a riveting movie-going experience. 23, the film is at times confusing and disorienting. It’s a simplistic and effective way of looking at an art form, but movies like “Annihilation” put that notion into question.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |